Sunday, 14 August 2011

Epistemology - interesting post from Farhan


Epistemology- Karl Popper  


The blog on Karl Popper’s perspective of epistemology describes a very interesting theory of three Worlds each with different contents but they are strongly linked to each other. These interdependent  worlds together form the solar system of knowledge.        


If a boy let’s say is walking knowledge thirsty in an indoors zoo, he steps up to the fishes in the tank  and merely touches them he feel the slippery surface of the fishes body, then he moves on to the baby panda and hugs it and plays with it for a long time and shares a pleasant experience. The boy then confronts a girl of the same age as his and eagerly interacts with her and spends a lot of time with her in the zoo, after that is done the huge majestic doors of the Zoo’s library catches his attention and as he enters he is awed by a heaps and heaps of books waiting to be read. He then learns more about the animals in the zoo he met through the books and pictures and some videos from the library’s computer. Later his zoo trip comes to an end when his parents pick him up expecting their son to have perceived enough knowledge for a 10 year old.       

So accordingly most of us reading the above short story will entitle the story as e.g. “A 10 year old’s Zoo experience” or  “Trip to the Zoo”, but Mr.Popper will entitle “Entering into the Three Worlds of Knowledge”. Mr. Popper has already understood that the young boy has been travelling from one world to another throughout the story, the boy when he felt the slippery skin surface of the fishes in the water and the softness of the fur of the panda these physical sensations are registered into World 1. This world consists of the reality and the knowledge gained physically, it consists of what is actually there in front of us but not that which we have pictured about it. The boy thinks that the fishes are fun to touch and the panda is very huggable, playful and completely harmless even though in reality news of attacks of wild pandas are not non-existing (World 1 has just been linked with World 2). The boy also has fun with the girl he met as talks to her and creates his own superficial opinion about her despite who he really is. These pleasantly experience of animal touching, boy’s thoughts of the animals and the girl all are registered in World 2. This world has all the things that we are have understood from the reality and the memories fun or boring that we have experienced. The boy when he finally enters the library and starts to scroll through the books he actually has landed on World 3 where the knowledge of the zoo animals are all printed in books or are saved in the computer as pictures or video files, these consist of all the observations by professionals of World 1. 

We now can definitely connect the three Worlds where World 2 is a human interpreted World of World 1 and all the evidences of World 2 are safe in World 3. 


Farhan Hasan

Saturday, 13 August 2011

Dhaka in the Past - One of the sweetest mails I received

When I saw the pictures of our old Dhaka, at that time I was thinking of my Fupa, he always talks about how dhaka city used to be, empty, old but yet stylish, he talks about the old cars which used to be there and how he loved those cars. When I saw the pictures, I felt he was so right about all the descriptions he gave. This image of Dacca was always in my imagination, on my mind, as, when he told me the stories I kept imagining the city and environment, and yesterday I felt like my imagination took the form of all those images being projected on the screen. Before, the city used to be enriched with culture and fine old architecture, but modernisation is making them gradually disappear; only few remains but still there is no proper maintenance. The image of Dhaka city has completely changed - probably for good. 


I felt like entering into that world through the pictures I saw on the screen.

Sir if you don't mind, may I please bring my pendrive to copy those pictures, I want to show them to my Fupa and Dad.



Lamia


Yes Lamia, Please bring your pendrive.

Zarat - thank you so much for taking a WHOLE Lecture!

Does the Universe have a purpose?

The great philosopher Plato believed that everything in the world has
a purpose. Why do plants grow? To be a source of food to the animals.
When their purpose ends, they die.The reason human beings and every
other creature in the world is created because each of them has a
purpose. Life is created for the fulfillment of its purpose. Our world
therefore must serve a purpose as well. And the world is a small part
of the momentous and gigantic universe. So does the universe have a
purpose as well?


If we consider religion, then the universe definitely has a purpose.
In most of the major religions of the world, the establishment of the
universe is not an accident. If the Great Design had been to create a
universe, then there must be some purpose behind it.
Another argument for the universe having purpose is that it is not
everlasting. Because the universe has an end, it makes me think that
it has a purpose. The pattern is similar to those things with a
purpose, a book, a plant or a cow—it is created, it serves its
purpose, and it demolishes. I feel inclined to believe that creation
arises when there is need, in other words, the “created” has a purpose
to serve.


Science also supports the purposeful universe. First of all, the vast
and enigmatic universe goads the scientists on their quest to find the
“meaning”. It in itself is serving a huge purpose by providing the way
for scientific study. Also, the universe holds many substances, carbon
atoms most specifically, in abundance. It is well designed and not
just a haphazard amalgamation of everything. Thus, it must have a
purpose.
“Everything happens for a reason”—can the creation of the universe be
just a mistake or a coincidence? How can something so well designed
develop from folly? One look at the universe tells us that there is
planning behind it. However, what is the purpose of the universe is a
more difficult question to answer. In fact, I think this question
doesn’t have a definite answer at all, yet. The challenge to find the
answer is something we have taken up and in the course we might make
several extraordinary discoveries. Can this not be a purpose of the
Universe?


Does moral action depend on reasoning?


Human beings are born with innate conscience. Even though it might be
dormant or less developed in some people, it can be argued more or
less strongly that all human beings possess conscience—the ability to
identify right from wrong. The fact may be that the conscience present
in a person is very rudimentary and that interaction with the social
world and mental development through learning process flourishes it to
give it a full-fledged form. In that case, conscience will differ from
person to person, depending on their social, moral and cultural
upbringing and the quality of their education. However, the true
essence of conscience must be similar for every human.
I think conscience plays a big role in deciding our moral actions.
Even if you do something against your conscience, you will feel guilty
about it and try to amend it in most cases. But does conscience always
coincide with our reasoning? Reasoning is also present in every human;
it is one of the distinguishing characteristics of humans. Reasoning
surely develops from brain but so does conscience—really? Conscience
has been attributed to the soul by ancient Greek philosophers. But if
we are to decide that, then we must debate on the existence of soul, a
separate entity from the mind and body.


When someone acts against common sense of reasoni
ng, we deem them to
be “crazy”. However, when someone opposes his conscience, it does not
mean he is without the faculty of reasoning.


A sudden action may not depend on either but last second impulses. It
is easy for a person to take part in a fire drill but when an actual
fire breaks out, what the person will do may not depend either on his
conscience or reasoning but his instinct to survive. I had read a book
called “The Selfish Gene”, where the author claims that human genes
are “selfish”, that is, their most important task is to live in. It is
by their manipulation that humans try to save their life. The author
has also given persuasive examples. I will quote a short one:
When a train is about to crash, a man, who was travelling with his
wife and son, throws his son out of the window to a safe distance. His
first instinct was to save his son. The author claims that it was the
doing of the “selfish gene” in him. The son is the carrier of the
man’s genes and will be able to pass them on to the next generation.
This means that by saving the son, the genes will be able to live on
and be passed on.  Thus this seeming act of altruism is actually
selfish indeed.


I feel that reason is not enough to decide moral action.

In the present world we are obsessed about gaining knowledge;
knowledge that will help us to survive in the increasingly competitive
world. We ask many questions that help us to know more but
epistemology takes us back to the most fundamental question of them
all: what is knowledge? What is this “substance” that people in the
ancient times sought and we still search for?
According to philosophers, knowledge is comprised of 3 worlds


1.    Physical world, physical perception
2.    Cognition, subjective personal perceptions
3.    Abstract items , objective abstract products of human mind


The quest for the meaning of knowledge thus begins. First of all,
there are two ways in which we can view the topic; one is objective
where the reality we experience everyday is considered the truth, the
other is the subjective way where the reality we experience is our
version of the truth. So subjectivism splits ‘me’ from the ‘us’ and
looks at me as an individual of the society. My version of truth may
not match with someone else’s; my reality may be someone else’s dream.
Knowledge is that which we interpret according to subjectivism however
in objectivist’s view, knowledge may or may not be known to us but it
is fixed.


Epistemology has developed throughout the age. The earliest known
theory associated with this subject may be behaviorism. Behaviorism is
about motivation and rewards and is connected mainly with people’s
intentions and desires which decide their course of action or
behavior. Many theories have also been suggested regarding
epistemology, to name a few: cognitivist theory, interactionalist
theory and adult learning theory.


If we briefly summarize each of the aforementioned theory for quicker
understanding, we can observe several new theories branching from
them.


Cognitivist theory focuses on the acquisition of knowledge through
cognitive structure. This is important because many philosophers
believed that “thoughts and reasons are legitimate sources of
knowledge”. This includes:


1.    Meaningful receptional learning which is learning through
association. The new things that we learn have to be linked to the
things we already know for improved learning.
2.    Cognitive information processing, which holds the human memory and
processing in a computer model. Through Rehearsal and Chunking (chunks
of information) the learner can put information in the Long-Term
Memory and retrieve that information if it is needed for responses.
Interactionalist theory focuses on the social and cultural factors of
learning. This includes:
1.    Vygotsky’s interactional theory which is related to the method
followed in our SAT class. Effective learning can take place through a
discourse between the instructor, who is more knowledgeable, and the
students. This kind of social interaction leads to the development of
cognition and reasoning.
2.    Bruner’s interaction theory is related to MRL. It states that the
knowers, or to be knowers, form a new idea in their mind by
associating it with past or present knowledge. However this raises a
question: when a child first learns something new, he does not have
any pre-knowledge, so how can the association theory work? Does this
mean every human being has some innate knowledge from birth or do they
just use their mental reason?
3.    Schema theory-I did not quite understand this theory but it is
stated that “schemas are non-hierarchical templates (data structures)
for representing the generic concepts stored in memory.” This seems to
be related to the CIP.
Adult learning theory mainly focuses on the fact that the learning
process of adults and children is not same. However, learning is a
process that occurs continuously throughout life, but the rate varies
at different periods of one’s life. Usually we consider childhood to
be one’s learning age and this may decrease an adult’s receptiveness
to knowledge. This includes:


1.    Constructivism is the application of knowledge, that is, applying
existing knowledge to solve new problems. Unless constructivism can be
achieved through learning, the learning has less meaning.
2.    Andragogy is recognizing the fact that children and adults learn
differently. They respond differently to the information offered to
them.
3.    Self directed learning is the most interesting form of learning. We
usually indulge into this type of learning the most. This is when we
pursue a topic of interest; so obviously, the subject varies from
person to person. Since this type of learning is driven by one’s own
will, it is less burdensome than any other types.
4.    Transformational learning aims to change how we know rather than
what we know.


Zarat.

2 Posts by Zarat


Does the free market corrode moral character?
The answer to this is a difficult one. At one side, it seems to enhance the moral characters in men while on the other side, it is dehumanizing.
The free market is spurred on strictly by the “profit-motive”. Competition increases and just as many opportunities open up, the failure to perform up to the standard can mean the end. Indeed, it is only “survival of the fittest”. When the people are threatened with their survival, there can hardly be any room for decency or moral action. Do we not value our lives above all? In this fierce competition, where defeat can question our survival, acts of altruism are strictly prohibited. It introduces novelty and “stirs up individual desire”.
It is true that it makes some rich and powerful men who might be able to contribute to the poor but it is human nature to want more. The gluttony of the human cannot be quenched. They will keep wanting more and more. In the process they will forget to think about those who are barely surviving. A group of French thinkers from the 1930s, called the “non-conformists”, had this view. It was also the main theme of fascism which called for an end to materialistic times.
If we check out the other side of the coin, we may find a different picture. Increased globalization leads to better income and decreased poverty. This encourages more schooling for the children which can act to nourish moral characters within them. The free market economy has also significantly bridged the gap between male and female wages. More people from different culture, religion and class come in contact with each other. This leads to increased socialization. People become connected and more “feeling”.  This may actually enhance their moral characters.
In the end it comes down to this: how easily can a person be changed? Can a person’s moral character be diluted just for the sake of competition and better earning? Can the surroundings induce a change in people’s characteristics which they have developed since birth?
Why Philosophy needs history? (TLS essay)-Bernard Williams
‘Lack of a historical sense is the hereditary defect of philosophers . . . So what is needed from now on is historical philosophising, and with it the virtue of modesty.’ Nietzsche.
Williams claims that most philosophers have neglected the history—not the history of philosophy but the history of the concepts philosophy is trying to understand. We need to understand our ethics and political ideals throughout the ages. We need to understand who we are from the roots, and that root does not mean from infancy but from the beginning of mankind. Thorough knowledge of history helps a philosopher to perceive the human nature, the way a human holds the world in his view.

Sadia's first Post on our BLOG

William Golding's Lord of the Flies is a timeless book packed with symbolism and insight into the darkest depths of human instinct. It explores the fundamental aspects of evil and the impulses that may cause people to generate violence that they never knew they were capable of. This alone is an impressive topic to cover in a mere 208 pages but Golding doesn't stop there. Lord of the Flies is crammed with symbolism, including many interesting parallels to the Bible. To fully understand all the campanologies the novel must be read many times. However, there are numerous equivalences that can be seen at first glance.

Foremost, the island where the boys' plane crashes represents Eden. It is a pristine and unspoiled place until humans arrive and corrupt it with their barbarity. In the beginning it seems like the island and the boys might be able to work in harmony but that is unfortunately not the case. As a matter of fact by the end of the book the whole land mass is up in flames due to savage human instincts.

In terms of people, Simon is definitely the most obvious Biblical parallel in the novel. He represents a Christ-like figure, saintly and selfless. From early on in Lord of the Flies he helps the littluns by finding fruit for them. Simon continues to show his altruistic characteristics throughout the book until he is met with the island's version of a crucifixion.

In my opinion, the most significant Biblical analogy occurs when Simon has a conversation with an impaled pig's head in the forest. Supposedly, this encounter represents Jesus' confrontation with the Devil during his 40 days in with wilderness. As Simon speaks with the pig's head which manifests itself into the Lord of the Flies his beliefs that the Beast is nonexistent are confirmed. To be more specific, he realizes that the Beast is not a creature but something that lives inside all of the boys. The Lord of the Flies says to him “I'm the Beast… Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill!”

To add on even more Biblical symbolism to Simon's encounter one must remember how the Devil was originally created. God sent one of His most prized angels down to Hell to keep guard but that angel ended up turning into the Devil. This fact basically expresses the whole theme of Lord of the Flies. All people have an evil that resides within them and given the “right” situation they may become cruel and violent in ways they never expected.

Of course, all of these comparisons just scratch the surface of what Golding managed to encompass in his classic novel. Lord of the Flies is a well written adventure story but it's more than that. It's a book that communicates the universal topic of morality, exploring what's right and wrong and how humans act when faced with challenging circumstances. I applaud Golding's ability to do this and I'm sure that his story will not soon be forgotten.

Nazir on Post-colonialism - may even replace my own lecture

White teeth and post colonial literature

When I first heard “post colonial literature” I thought it was about
the era of colonization. Lacking knowledge about this field this
article in short gave me a compact view of what it is. It is about
understanding the perception of the Europeans, who colonized different
parts of the world, that their society and culture were the ideal ones
and superior to all other. Some wrote of it as a mere observation
comparing the colonized people to their European culture and declaring
them as “savages”, while some wrote of it as means of criticizing this
idea of superiority of the white Europeans.

An example of the after effect of colonization is found in the passage
by Millat. He is confused about his sense of belonging because he is
not fit for going and living in his own country and at the same time
he is marginalized by his race in UK. I happened to have known this
feeling among some of my friends in Australia who are third generation
Lebanese Australians. They were born it that country and their parents
were also born in that country and most of them have not even seen
Lebanon yet but still when they roam around in a white eastern suburb
of Sydney some people shout at them “go back to your country”. They
feel confused about where do they actually belong but some of these
white Australians tend to forget they are not the indigenous people of
Australia, they are immigrants as well. A famous quote in Australia,
which was first heard in a Lebanese Australian movie “The
Combination”, when a Lebanese school boy was fighting with an
Australian white boy, is “We came in planes, you’se came in chains”.
The meaning is that the first European white Australians were
convicts.

Following post demands ferocious support OR Assault - will someone do it in a way that will open our eyes? Author Undisclosed


Hello sir,

I have read Babbitt by Sinclair Lewis, and it has given me a profound insight on the repercussions of the American dream. The american dream is a fantasy of many, ready to enjoy its perks,status and high paychecks. But though the downsides are clearly evident , individuals choose not to realize it. Babbitt is one of the best representations, of how the American dream can only be achieved by sacrificing autonomy. One has to pay the huge price of sacrificing autonomy and embracing a conformist life, or else he will me made an outcast in the society. His peers will no more appreciate him, the society will reprimand him and force him to join their league. As only then he would be honored, his intellects would be appreciated. Individuals are confined by the basic norms of the society, the american dream is a autocrat ,who though puts up a fake pretense of democracy will crush every maverick which comes upon it path.

George Folansbee Babbitt, a successful 46 year old, who has let the society shape him into their desired person is made into an outcast, treated as a mere nobody when he espouses his liberal views and chooses to support in what he believes in. In the end, we see he surrenders and returns being the old Babbitt- a solid, confirming standard citizen. He is a prisoner to the American dream and he cannot free itself from its chains. however, when his son Ted Babbitt marries the pretty Eunice and drops out of college to be a factory worker, he consents to the alliance and encourages his son to protect his Autonomy. Babbitt realizes Ted has achieved salvation and is free from the norms which tied Babbitt.

Sir, Babbitt is a detailed satire of the vices of the American Dream but not an eye opener. Even I want a piece of the American Dream and I'm fully aware of its repercussions. We all know implicitly but like Babbitt desire to keep our eyes shut, so we are not exposed to realism. Like Blanche Dubois in the play " the streetcar named desire" we prefer the dim light as it prevents exposure, conceals reality. Maybe we are not mature enough to realize how loss of Autonomy feels or maybe we are naive enough to think we are capable to do what millions have failed to do, bring a change. Some of us are completely fine with whatever it will require to get those big paychecks, from forgetting our morals and views, to instilling in our minds things we don't believe in. Honestly I might sound rude but some us are so shallow that we don't have our independent views on major agendas and are indifferent to the world we live in, so for them there is nothing to loose, and believe me there are many who fall in this particular stereotype. Which group do I fall in?? I do not know. Would I give up my autonomy to realize my dream? I'm skeptic, I can relate myself to Babbitt, you would achieve your goals if you stick to the status quo. Will I be happy in the end?? This is one question I want you to answer me. A 17 year old cannot comprehend what millions have failed to. In the end MAYBE is always the answer.

Thank You.
. ......exposed 

All female warriors - Miss Julie, Medea, Madame Bovary, Hedda Gabler


All are by Nazir.


Miss Julie

In this play the author brings out few different social issues with the story. First issue is extreme feminism which we can understand that Miss Julie was raised up by her mother to despise the male race but ironically Miss Julie tells Jean that her mother believes in gender equality and women’s rights and independence. Her mother either got a misconception about gender equality or she is plainly a hypocrite because she tries to oppress the opposite gender in the same way the male gender does. This feeling of superiority is found in Miss Julie as she loses are fiancé by treating him like a dog. Still these social and environmental influences seems to break loose once her human instincts takes over and submits sexually to a valet, Jean, who is much lower in the social class than her. The play brings out another issue with this incident. The old barrier between the aristocracy and the common people seems to be decimating. We can see that Jean a servant of a count knows how to speak French and drinks wine and Miss Julie the aristocrat is drinking common folk’s drinks and the barrier comes totally down between them after they become intimate. Although the barrier breaks between them it does not mean at that time, during the late 19th century, this barrier was already lifted but it started initiating then and the influence of this social class distinction was so powerful in the society that we witness the death of Miss Julie for not being able to fight against these environmental and cultural forces. 

It is surprising that the western culture thought about these issues more than 100 years ago because in our culture in Bangladesh we still see these same scenarios. The gender inequality and also the distinction between the social classes are very much visible. I am quite certain that all of us in our culture faced situations that we can relate to this play. For example, still in our culture we have servants and they are not fit to sit down on the same table as us and eat with us. Although the situation is getting better it is still going in a very slow pace to correct the inequality in our culture. One fact is true that most of us do not welcome this change who are benefiting from this social class difference.

Medea

This is a tragic play based on the Greek mythology. Medea is a powerful sorceress who falls in love with Jason and marries him at the cost of abandoning her family and her country. In return after few years of marital bliss Jason abandons her for power and greed and marries another woman for her kingdom and fame. One of the issues brought out in this play by the author, Euripides, is that the ill treatment of women in the society where they had to listen to the men and bend to the command of men without any complains. Medea complains about these issues when she is very distressed and hurt due to the infidelity of her husband. She emphasizes about the difficulty of the role of women in the society where they do not have any freedom or rights. This uncontrollable passion drives her to do the unthinkable.
Medea plots the murder of the bride of Jason and the bride’s father and after that kills her two sons to spite Jason. Here the author tries to bring out another issue: Medea’s and Jason’s own character flaws brings their own destruction. Medea’s passion for revenge and Jason’s greed for power and fame and his committing infidelity, brings both their downturn by losing everything they had. 

I find it very interesting to understand that the author of the play brought out issues in those days (431 B.C) about women’s rights and the role of women in the society. Undoubtedly ancient Greece had a male dominated culture but the authors of those days recognized gender inequality as a problem of society. We can see that infidelity was a major issue even then because some acts are always hazardous irrelevant of what time we are talking about. In spite of all the literatures from that early stage, it seems like there was not much done to bring change to these issues because the western civilization gave rights and freedom to women only in the last 50 to 60 years. Women in their culture could not vote or own properties before that. Although this play is more than 2000 years old we can still relate to the issues brought up to expose the social and cultural problems of that era. I reckon that is what makes these plays immortal.

Madam Bovary

Emma Bovary’s fantasy of the life she read about in the romantic novels distorts her view of the real life. She pursuits her materialistic dream by constantly deceiving her husband for men she thought would make her dream come true. Instead of looking for the fundamental aspects of love she looks for the wealth and riches and lavishness. Her selfishness and distorted view of life end her in being promiscuous and used up as an object of sex and it also put her in great financial debt. Ironically the superior life she dreamed about and chased turned her into an object of town gossip about her extramarital activities and ruined her reputation. Like the other two plays we talked about earlier, this character also ends up in destruction due to her flaws in character. 

It is typical in a situation like this that, although Madam Bovary is in fault, still the men who committed adultery with her did not face similar fate as her. She ended up taking her life out of shame and guilt. There was clearly an issue about gender inequality as the two men who she had a non platonic relationship with had a happy ending with no string attached to their behavior but Emma ends up taking arsenic and killing herself. The genre of this novel is called realism where the author is not objective or passes judgment about any character. Things are portrayed as it is without any embellishment. I now understand the difference between naturalism and realism. Naturalism is involved in Miss Julie where it shows that no matter how much we are influenced by society or environment we still break the rules due to natural instincts. This is related to Darwin’s theory of natural selection because Miss Julie forgot about her status and committed adultery with a common folk because her natural desire took over her while trying to suppress it constantly.


Hedda Gabler

Hedda seems to be a walking destruction wherever she goes. She is not like the other women we have spoke earlier about but, she is well in control of herself and does not give in to temptations. She suppresses her free will to extent that it makes her restless and she cannot stand to see other people happy. She deliberately destroys the life of Lovborg by burning his manuscript which was supposed to give him financial stability and help him get together with his lover Thea. Hedda have feelings for Lovborg and she despises Thea, and she cannot stand the thought of seeing them happy. Her attitude is one of extreme jealousy because she burns the manuscript which Thea and Lovborg worked on together and called it their baby. I think this act can be compared to the one where Medea kills her two sons just to spite Jason. After an act like this Hedda does not stop there but she further has the audacity to give Lovborg a gun to kill himself. Her attitude is that if she is not happy no one can be happy. 

She seems to be also a very materialistic person like Madam Bovary because she talks about the promises made by her husband George, of giving her the lavish life she wants. She also got a commanding attitude like Miss Julie who thinks very superior of her self and above all other. This is the reason she ends up taking her own life when she realizes that Judge Brack got leverage on her and she has no control of the situation. I find a clear similarity between the four women, Hedda Gabler, Madam Bovary, Medea and Miss Julie. They all seem to throw themselves in the path of annihilation and the common reason is power. They all have pressures that do not allow them much freedom of will due to the social framework they are supposed to fit in. If they defile that order in society it brings their downfall and also if they suppress their desires that also brings out other negative aspects.

Example of a Report that shows Challenges Confronted

Sir, I read the White teeth Post colonialism along with other items which I'd be mentioning later. I did understand the first few pages. Things became a bit critical when I came in first and second wave post colonialism. Hybridity became even tougher. And I did NOT at all understand what the text has tried to say, or rather focus on, in transcultural. 


Saif

Report on Araby by James Joyce


In “Araby,” the allure of new love and distant places mingles with the familiarity of everyday drudgery, with frustrating consequences. Mangan’s sister embodies this mingling, since she is part of the familiar surroundings of the narrator’s street as well as the exotic promise of the bazaar. She is a “brown figure” who both reflects the brown facades of the buildings that line the street and evokes the skin color of romanticized images of Arabia that flood the narrator’s head. Like the bazaar that offers experiences that differ from everyday Dublin, Mangan’s sister intoxicates the narrator with new feelings of joy and elation. His love for her, however, must compete with the dullness of schoolwork, his uncle’s lateness, and the Dublin trains. Though he promises Mangan’s sister that he will go to Araby and purchase a gift for her, these mundane realities undermine his plans and ultimately thwart his desires. The narrator arrives at the bazaar only to encounter flowered teacups and English accents, not the freedom of the enchanting East. As the bazaar closes down, he realizes that Mangan’s sister will fail his expectations as well,and that his desire for her is actually only a vain wish for change.Instead of reaffirming his love or realizing that he does not need gifts to express his feelings for Mangan’s sister, the narrator simply gives up.Joyce suggests that all people experience frustrated desire for love and new experiences.

Best regards,

Sadia

Epistemology


Some notes from someone.

Following the links on epistemology from the blog I have gathered the following so far.

Behaviourism: One uses tools to control or alter behavious of another. 

Ways of knowing:

 C.I.P: Processes that break down and help us retain information.

M.R.L: Learning by realting to already learned concepts.

Shema theory: One's mind has information organized in a certain way. The level of organization should be improved to learn more or better.

Bruner's Interactional Theory: This theory emphasizes on thinking rather than the content of the information itself. It uses other sensory senses to help in the process of learning. 

Vygotsky's Interactional Theory: Social interaction forms the basis of this. Enquiry and problem solving is encouraged. 

Constructivism: Certain processes are followed in a specific order to solve probelms together in a group.

Andragogy Theory: Focuses on individual learning and proper planning of the learning process itself. The process is stressed upon, not the content of learning. 

Self-Directed Learning: No external forces are included in the learning process- self motivation is the main key and individual himself persues knowledge on his own. 

Transformational learning: This requires past experiences; information can be learnt from them by deep thoughts and debating over relevant issues from different perspectives. 

According to Karl Popper, theories containing empirical information should be critisized and trested. He states that knowledge has three different worlds (I was thinking of knowledge being 3-Dimensional when I read this). They are the physical world, the world of personal thoughts and the world of products of the thoughts. Each world is connected to the others in different ways and he further goes on to describe how. 

Shababa. 

Thursday, 11 August 2011

Cupcake in GRANTA

A strange piece of writing- "Cupcake". (www.granta.com) It shows how consuming excess alcohol is a form of self-destruction. The title draws the attention of anyone who happens to glance at it, put presents something completely different than what the reader expects. The way it's written, I feel, is extremely interesting. Cupcake thinks that he's not a piece of trash right before he dies. The irony here is that his dead body's found in a dump. 

"How to write about Bulgaria" has humourous content and provides entertainment for readers. At the same time it does contain valuable advice. 

Shababa

We are closed till Sunday

This might seem relief to a few - and to a good many a disappointment - I will not hold classes on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. So, on Monday - that is 15th August, 2011 - we will have the class. I will try to get a few of my US returnee students on that day. I can not arrange any other dates as I have to leave for Edinburgh on the night of 16th August.

However, I intend to conduct classes over the mail and through the BLOG during the entire 12 to 15 days absence. My Theatre team shall go to Paris and Amsterdam (tow cities I consider inferior to Dhaka in terms of dynamism) - but I will be back to Dhaka by 30th August.  

Please visit the BLOG at least twice during my absence.

Watch out for the next post tomorrow at 11 am.

A ver Fine Site for Writing Techniques

One of the best of its kind.

http://www.northland.cc.mn.us/owl/

Tuesday, 9 August 2011

Monday, 8 August 2011

Shababa's Report and my Inputs

Dear Sir,

On searching for articles related to the Irish and Indian famines, I came across a review on the book "Three Famines", by Thomas Keneally. Keneally is said to have blamed politicians of that time for the terrible fate of the people suffereing from the famine. He critisizes Sir Winston Churchill for being a racist when it comes to Indians. A sense of abbhorence is developed towards Churchill as Keneally points out his inhuman comments on the Bengal population, despite them being an important part of the British troops. Yet another important theme that is held up by the writer is, that nothing had been learnt from history, that is, the Irish famine, where the same factors had led to the sufferings of many. 

Another article that came up from the search is "Entitlement, Shortage and the 1943 Bengali Famine: Another look" by Mark B. Tauger.The article discusses Amartya Sen's approach to famines and their causes. The writer begins by outlining two different apporaoches to famine- one being the actual shortage of food due to natural disasters or failure of crop prodeuction, the other being the availability of the produced food to people. The writer obviously supports the latter. "Starvation is the characteristic of some people not having food to eat. It is not the characteristic of there not being enough food to eat. While the latter can be a cuse of the former, it is but one of many possible causes. Whether and how starvation relates to food supply is a matter for factual investigation."This argument by Amartya Sen is well reasoned and it is extremely difficult to oppose it in any way, clearly validating Sen's perspective of the causes of a famine being a flaw in the structure or political actions in a country. 

Both the above articles provide a new point of view to famines, contrary to the common reaction to a famine which is- "Oh, there must be a shortage of food." They broaden our perspectives, stimulating us to think in a different way, to understand better not only the issue at hand, but also other situations. 

Shababa.

Dear Students,


Please check a few words about a book by Madhusree Mukerjee - Churchill's Secret War. The publication of ths book was angrily refuted by the the official Churchill Museum Authority - only proving that opinions can generate dangerous foes. The article by Pulitzer finalist Arthur Herman (the second link below) is probably one of the lousiest I have read in my recent memory. Will some find the fallacies in his own thoughts? 

Follow the links - 


Those who failed to take the test on Sunday + Monday

Here are the ones who failed to appear on MOCKS for Sunday and Monday. It would be very helpful if you could send me mails explaining your circumstances.

Sukanya - Riasat - Sanzat - Serajul - Muntaseer.

Giving the MOCK makes one confident and improves control over the time-management and stress. We will have the 3rd Mock tomorrow. All the above students are requested to participate.

Please also check some VERY important blog-posts made yesterday.

Sunday, 7 August 2011

2 Perfect Blogs on Epistemology - Behaviourism

MOCK test Tomorrow at 7.30 pm

Farhan (Sunbeams), Shanzat, Sukanya, Serajul, Muntaseer, Rizal, Sarah, Rinat, Tanzid, Nazir - You are all requested to take part in the MOCK tomorrow - since you did not appear the MOCK today.

Tomorrow the MOCK starts at 7.30 am and there will be no Essay-writing. Please bring your copy of Princeton - 11 Tests Book; Calculator; Pencil.

Please confirm your presence through an SMS or e-mail.



Dover Beach - A report I liked for its balanced sentences

'Dover Beach'

Dover Beach is a poem through which Matthew Arnold expresses his deep sadness due to the growing impersonality of the industrial age in the mid 1800s, and as a result, the distance created between mankind and their faith in religion, their loss of connection with nature. In spite of the melancholy tone of the poem, the poet did not fail to present the words in a nice manner using alliterations and similes to make it sound rhythmic and lifelike.

According to Arnold, the advancements in science has cast shadows of doubt and confusion in people's belief in God and the Bible. In the opening stanza the poet creates an environment of dimming effects of light (light gleams and is gone) indicating that people's confidence in the concept of religion which was once strong was getting weaker due to the clashes between the religion and scientific theories...and so he finds it painful that 'the sea of faith' has become the sea of despair and desolation leaving suspicion of religion in the minds of people, creating a dark world filled with bewilderment, hatred and no morals. They have no light of hope to guide them ahead, only loneliness and misery. They are mislead by the cravings for materialistic life which seems is mysteriously dangerous....

Arnold believes that only love and intimacy can bring out the world from the darkness of distress and so he calls out to the listener to be honest and true to each other and their principles, because the rest of the world is a misguidance.

Durdana

Epistemological Observation



The most persistent problem in the theory of knowledge, therefore, is not what knowledge is or what it comes from, but whether there is any such thing at all. 

Romana



Of Grammar and Philosophy - Comment invited

There are some linguistic and philosophical problematics associated with the following paragraph. Can anyone identify what are the issues? -


Carlyle explains that the true biographer, his ideal image of what the role entitles, does not merely 'reflect' the image and life of his subject but in addition to giving a clear picture of the protagonist he also subjects his central concern to his own artistic depiction and moulding to ultimately transfer the actual role of editing to the reader. He feels it is a necessity for the biographer to side his view on the subject for this result to be achieved.

[Write your opinions in the comments box. Maximum 2 sentences allowed.]

Thursday, 4 August 2011

SAT Class on Friday Cancelled

Dear Students,

I have decided to cancel tomorrow's Friday SAT class - however, SAT class will be held at 10.15 am. Please notify those who want to join the SAT class. The Saturday class will repeat the items we discussed in class to day Thursday. So, those who attended Thursday class need NOT attend Saturday Class.

Everyone should send reports.

Mock - Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday

There will be 4 MOCKS this week - Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday - all will be at 7.30. 

Wednesday, 3 August 2011

What is History: E. H. Carr - post from Romana


I have read "What is History" by E.H. Carr and what I've gathered that History can always be a little biased. Since the dawn of history, historical interpretations have always been centered upon the cultural influences on the one who make them. Then again, when was history created? But what we do know is that it is and was man-made, not by any neutral body. Let's take our own country's case after the war in 1971; to Bangladesh the war was the most heartbreaking and glorious chapter in the proud Bengali's lives while to the Pakistanis it would be a completely different thing; they would call this the utmost form of rebel by people they had once had rule on. Carr was well known for his assertions in "What is History?" denying moral judgements in history. He argued that it was ahistorical for the historian to judge people in different times according to the moral values of his or her time. He also said that individuals should be judged only in terms of the values of the historians time and/or place, not by the values of the historians time and/or place. In Carr's opinion, historians should not act as judges. He also depicts that history does not contain every information but the "facts" the historians choose to make use of. In Carr's famous example, he claimed that millions had crossed the Rubicon (a river), but only Julius Caesar's crossing in 49 BC is declared noteworthy by historians. In general, Carr held to a deterministic outlook in history.
 
This item is a great piece of historiography in reading which we start questioning all those history books we read in school. Is any fact we come to know of the past a real fact, or items with prejudice at its core? History is recorded for only those the historians deem to be important. But what is important and who is to decipher this question?

Sartor Resartus - Report from Nazir

Sir, this is the report Sartor Resartus.


I found this essay extremely challenging to read and through the first
five pages it was tiresome to go through such eloquent language and an
alien topic that I never read about. As I went on I found it very
interesting yet challenging because there was a lot of information I
never knew about or thought of and as I started to understand, I was
already taking sides to the argument involved in my mind. From this
essay I understood the roles of the subject of the biography, the
biographer and the editor.

In Croker’s edition of Boswell’s Life of Johnson, Croker claims that
the greatness of the Life of Johnson is due to the editor’s
reconstruction of the original. He argues that the subject and the
biographer mainly work with anecdotes and other trivial resources and
it is the art of the editor to validate the information and make it
presentable to the reader by literary art. This is the reason for his
systematic attack and criticism on Boswell, the biographer, in his
edition of Life of Johnson. These claims fueled a controversy about;
whether the greatness of the Life of Johnson due to the subject,
Johnson or the genius of its author. This created tension between the
relationship of the subject of the biography, the author of the
biography and the editor Croker.

Carlyle claimed that it is the art of the biographer that makes
biographies like the Life of Johnson great. He even spoke in defense
of Boswell and criticized Croker for being conspicuous through his
commentary in the biography when it should be solely about the
subject. But in Carlyle’s Sartor Resartus, the Editor’s (Carlyle’s)
Heuschrecke’s Teufelsdrockh, he seems to repeat the same thing Croker
did by criticizing the biographer and the subject, Heuschrecke and
Teufelsdrockh. In his book he seems to be repeating the actions of
Croker which he criticized earlier and therefore; the author of the
essay argues that Carlyle’s and  Heuschrecke’s Teufelsdrockh in Sartor
Resartus resembles Croker’s and Boswell’s Johnson and thus makes
Carlyle the unreliable editor.

Posts from ZARAT on Catcher in the Rye - Lord of the Flies - Idea of Justice - Anna Karenina


The Catcher in the Rye—Salinger
The Catcher in the Rye is an Apprenticeship novel.
It is the story of Holden Caulfield, a troubled teenager. It is a personal narrative and Holden’s language is crude and curt. He uses fairly informal language. The language lacks decorum but gets to the reader more easily due to its conversational nature.
It is a possibility that Salinger had portrayed his youth in Holden. There are several similarities between their lives. Holden does not elaborate on his childhood but goes back to the winter of the previous year when he flunked out of school, failing four of his five subjects. He had been to many boarding schools but had graduated from none. Although we see him struggling, he actually is very bright. He can perceive other characters very well and he doesn’t like most of them, calling them “phonies”. He dislikes people who pretend to impress other people. Even though he lies frequently and claims to be a very convincing liar, he never does so o impress people. In fact, he shies away from company by insulting the people he doesn’t like.
He seems to have feelings only for a few people—his parents, his younger brother Allie who died from leukemia, his younger sister, Phoebe, his older brother D.B and his neighbor, Jane. He is frustrated about his roommate, Stradlater who dates Jane. He is a principled young man and is intelligent. He goes through the agonies of an adolescent but we see his generous side when he helps two nuns. He hates the world around him; his intense frustration does not allow him to mix in the society. He complains about school and his classmates. He hides his inability to communicate candidly by blaming others of being “phony”.
After he leaves school, he spends some time aimlessly, going to nightclubs and hotels. He is impatient and lonely throughout this time. He cannot adapt to the society around him. He does not gain the maturity that is expected of him. However, he can communicate easily with his younger sister who, although he claims her to be much more intelligent than him, is also undecided like him.
He dreams to be a catcher in the rye, catching children playing in the field of rye from falling off a cliff. He is emotionally disturbed. However, on a day out with his sister, he realizes that children should be allowed to do whatever they want so that they can learn of danger and adapt to the surrounding environment in their own way.
While reading this I came across the poem, “Comin’ Thro’ the Ryes” by Robert Burns. It is written in a different style of English. Holden’s inspiration to become a catcher in the rye comes from this poem.
The novel depicts Holden’s internal struggles which cause him to isolate himself. His self-esteem does not allow him to stoop and believe that his problems are due to his own faults.
In the present we find Holden at a clinic receiving psychiatric therapy because of his mental problems. However, he speaks of hope. He would be attending a new school and he misses all the people he mentioned in the narrative.
The Lord Of the flies—William Golding
The story of some boys stranded on a deserted island, away from human civilization. After a plane crash, the boys find themselves to be the only survivors on the island. On the island the boys built up a civilization, electing a leader and starting a fire to attract passing ships.
The protagonist is Ralph, a matured and cool-headed boy who becomes the leader. However, he has difficulty in controlling the boys and faces a lot of opposition, especially from a boy named Jack, who was a candidate for the leader as well. Ralph’s character gains profundity as he tries to discipline the haywire kids. He tries to bring order from chaos. He symbolizes the idealist, who believes in the fairness of the world but is in for a rude awakening.
Jack, on the other hand, is power hungry. He uses force when needed and is ruthless. He kills many of the boys and orders a hunt for Ralph. He grows barbaric and breaks all the civilization established on the island. In the end, the boys are saved by a British Naval officer who carries them away to civilized society. However, here we come to a debate--what is civilization? Is the naval officer, who will take part in the war and kill his fellow human beings, any better than the barbaric Jack? He will also destroy civilization as we know it.
Read The Idea of Justice by Nobel laureate, Amartya Sen.
In the beginning, the author presents a wonderful quote: “An event has happened, upon which it is difficult to speak and impossible to be silent.” Edmund Burke said this on the impeachment of Warren Hastings in 1789.
The author claims that reason should be brought into play to decide about justice and injustice. He focuses mainly on two theories—one is the transcendental theory where absolute justice is possible to decide and the other is the comparative theory where justice is decided based on the idea that the other options are unjust. He also classifies justice into Argument focused justice and realization focused (concentrates on behavior of people) justice.
He toys with the idea of “perfect justice”, which under all circumstances is the right thing to do however, sometimes justice cannot be dished out so easily. He also discusses on the theory of “justice as fairness”. He states that people may think that they know exactly what is just but different people may find different situations just. It depends on their reasoning and moral belief. In the eyes of different people justice stands different. Some may think that justice will be brought about by one action while others will find that action unjust.
He argues for comparative justice because he feels that perfect justice is quite a redundant theory when we are facing actual choices in real life. Also the standard of perfection is debatable. No one can agree on one fixed definition of justice.
It is amazing to note that “different people will state that there is one straightforward just resolution that is easily detected but they would each argue for totally different resolutions as being obviously right.”
He says, like Adam Smith, while thinking up a moral action we have to place ourselves as “impartial spectators”, so that our bias loses ground. He believes that the world looks different depending on the position the person is standing on it.
He quotes many notable philosophers and economists although he disagrees with many. In the last chapter, ‘Reasons, Sentiment and Enlightenment’, he talks about Hume and Smith, who feel that our reasoning is strongly influenced by our sentiments. Smith argues strongly that our emotions and psychological response are very important in governing our activities, especially our spontaneous or instantaneous reactions.
Read Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy.
A realistic novel where we see a few cases of adultery and the aftermath of them. First, Stiva Oblonsky cheats his wife, Dolly, who wants to leave him with their children. However, Stiva’s sister, Anna Karenina reconciles the couple.
Dolly’s younger sister, Kitty, is wooed by two suitors, Vronsky and Levin, Stiva’s friend. At first she seems to show partalty to Vronsky but he disappoints her. He meets and falls in love with Anna Karenina, wife of St. Petersburg official, Karenin.  After some time, Anna openly admits about her affair with Vronsky to her husband.
On the other hand, Kitty feels her love for Levin and they get engaged and eventually marry. Anna becomes pregnant and her generous husband decides not to divorce her. She goes to Italy with Vronsky, wandering around aimlessly. They return, only to be spurned by the society in Anna’s case. Here we come to the social injustice. Anna, charged with adultery, is talked of by the society as a disgrace whereas Vronsky, participator in the same crime, is free to go about as if nothing happened. Stiva also escapes the social wrath even though he commits adultery. Anna cannot show her face in society and grows jealous of Vronsky. She becomes paranoid and claims that Vronsky does not love her anymore. Her pent up frustrations make her delirious and one day, when she went to the station to meet Vronsky, she throws herself in front of a train and dies.
Kitty bears Levin a son. At first Levin was frustrated by the lessening freedom of married life and felt mixed confusion towards his son. But after saving Kitty and his son from a thunderstorm, he realizes that he truly loves them. He accepts his life and starts to care for his family.

Monday, 1 August 2011

A fine example of Well-drafted Report for those who are asking - what does it look like?

Dear Sir,

I've finished "Death of a Salesman", "A Modest Proposal" and "The Old Man and the Sea".

In "Death of a Salesman", we find old Will Loman, 63, with ever a supporting pillar-wife Linda-and two sons; Biff being the older and Hap the younger son. We find Willy not happy with his life and often drowns into hallucinations and illusions about past events as he wants to relive those moments rather than his present state. He, like many other American men of that century, is in conflict with the society. He tries to compete with the materialistic America but is a failure every time. He does not get income anymore and he fails to mold his son, Biff into success. This shows the inability of Willy Loman to fulfill his dream of living a life more prosperous and rewarding but refuses to accept what he is- ordinary, average and unremarkable. 

The novella "The Old Man and the Sea" is an epitome of how courage and perseverance can pay off ultimately and how relentless effort can make one win even though all seems to be lost. Santiago- one proud old fisherman- who even in the face of old age and utter bad luck does not surrender. He does not get derailed when people say he has lost his talent of catching big fishes, rather, he takes it as a challenge. It is thought that Hemmingway intended to portray Santiago as Jesus as there are ample symbolisms in the short story alluding to the experiences of Jesus Christ. 

In "A Modern Proposal", the writer, Jonathan Swift makes a completely out-of-the-world and ridiculous proposal of how to help the poor Irish people to gain food and live a better life. After the first reading I thought the idea was funny ( I did laugh while reading it) and beyond absurd. But,of course, as I read more I realized there was more ironical sense to it than I comprehended. The writer used some lines to actually intend the opposite of what he said. He says that serving fat child at an inn would win the keeper much profit and free him of some burden. With this he means the shameless exploitation the English do with people of Ireland.

Thank you

Romana

Our Class is Tomorrow at 8 am - A very good report on Magic Realism - One of my favourite posts!

The following report is by Nazir.

Magic realism was initially in the form of visual art during the time
expressionism was fading. It was a term first used by the art
historian Franz Roh in 1925. After gradually burgeoning it was in
Latin America that the term was first applied to literary art. The
reason for its success is it distinguishes from other genres as it is
not fantasy where the reader does not question the reality as the
setting itself is magical; whereas in magic realism the ‘magic’ is
embedded in reality. In my view the most plausible way the author
describes magic realism is as follows:

“To revivify and expand our sense of the “real,” Magic Realism also rediscovers
“the charm of the object,” by looking in a fresh, childlike way at the
familiar, with such attentiveness and intensity that it is
defamiliarized, and once again becomes a source of awe and wonder.”

The reason for quoting this line is that it is true, like fantasy, we
are not taken to a different world which is unfamiliar to us but
instead we look at something mundane in a different way that takes
away our knowledge of it and makes it an object of incredulity. This
aspect of it made it political because it defies the dogma of order.
Therefore; the fame of it started in Latin America as this region saw
extreme political conditions for the last 500 years and in conditions
where it was not possible to criticize openly, “the metaphors and
hyperboles were used to express their sentiments.” It was also used to
describe the social condition and to correct the culture which made
the readers question their order of things.

I find this article very revealing as an introduction to the literary
term “Magic Realism” because it is true that without knowledge about
this term I would simply declare it as fantasy. As I did not read
Metamorphosis yet, this article will prepare me to read the book and
understand the meaning that it is trying to portray. It will make me
look for the metaphors and the hyperboles it represents.